FinTech: Final report of the Expert Group on Regulatory Obstacles to Financial Innovation: 30 recommendations on regulation, innovation and finance

13 gennaio 2020

On 13 December 2019 the Expert Group on Regulatory Obstacles to Financial Innovation (ROFIEG), set up by the European Commission in June 2018, published its recommendations on how to create an accommodative framework for technology-enabled provision of financial services (‘FinTech’).

The group's 30 recommendations are pertaining to the innovative use of technology in finance, maintaining a level playing field, access to data, and the financial inclusion and ethical use of data.

In particular, the recommendations can be grouped into four categories:

– First, the need to adapt regulation to respond to new and changed risks caused by the use of innovative technologies, such as AI and DLT, and take up any emerging opportunities with respect to RegTech or SupTech (Recommendations 1-12);

– Second, the need to remove regulatory fragmentation and ensure a level playing field between incumbents and new market entrants, both FinTech start-ups and BigTech firms, across the entire EU (Recommendations 13-24);

– Third, the necessity to reconcile the regulation of personal and non-personal data with the opportunities and risks offered by FinTech (Recommendation 25-28);

– Fourth, the need to consider the potential impacts of FinTech from the perspective of financial inclusion and the ethical use of data (Recommendations 1 and 29-30).

According to ROFIEG, the top Recommendations in terms of regulatory reform, highlighting the need to address as a matter of priority, are the following:

– The explainability and interpretability of technology, especially AI, as measures to protect consumers and businesses and facilitate supervision, or to meet supervisory expectations (Recommendation 1);

– The creation of a regulatory framework built on the principle that activities that create the same risks should be governed by the same rules, with a view to ensuring adequate regulation and supervision and maintaining a level playing field (Recommendation 13);

– The ending of regulatory fragmentation, especially in the area of customer due diligence (CDD)/know your customer (KYC), as an important step towards creating a level playing field (Recommendations 15-17);

– Preventing unfair treatment of competing downstream services by large, vertically integrated platforms, in order to strengthen innovation and maintain consumer choices (Recommendation 22);

– The strengthening of the framework for access to, processing and sharing of data, in order to promote innovation and competition and establish a level playing field amongst actors (Recommendations 27 and 28).

 

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

mag12

12/05/2026

Approvazione delle condizioni tecnico economiche del servizio “Open Stream FWA 5G” per il completamento della copertura nelle c.d. aree bianche (Listino "C&D”) da parte di Open Fiber S.p.A. beneficiario di aiuto di Stato

Con la delibera n. 96/26/CONS Agcom approva, ai sensi delle delibere n. 120/16/CONS e n. 171/25/CONS e sulla base dei criteri indicati negli Orientamenti della Commissione europea, nel rispetto di quanto

mag12

12/05/2026

Avvio del procedimento e della consultazione pubblica concernenti l’approvazione delle offerte di riferimento di TIM per gli anni 2025 e 2026 relative ai servizi di terminazione delle chiamate nella rete telefonica pubblica fissa

In applicazione della delibera n. 13/22/CONS di analisi dei mercati dei servizi d’interconnessione nella rete telefonica pubblica fissa, TIM ha pubblicato le offerte di riferimento relative ai

mag12

12/05/2026

Concorsi pubblici ed intelligenza artificiale

(T.A.R. Lazio Roma, Sez. III bis, 02/02/2026, n. 1895CONCORSI A PUBBLICI IMPIEGHI › Bando del concorso, requisiti, ammissione ed esclusioneParti: P.C. c. Ministero dell'Istruzione e

News Giuridiche

mag14

14/05/2026

Avvocato non adempie al mandato difensivo? È tenuto al risarcimento del danno

<p>La responsabilità del prestatore

mag14

14/05/2026

Condannato affetto da infermità irreversibile: per il rinvio dell’esecuzione della pena non occorre un termine

<p>La <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10SE0003156672"

mag14

14/05/2026

Genitorialità a distanza: la Cassazione supera il mito della prossimità fisica

<p>In regime di affidamento condiviso,