Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 june 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

News archive

 

Firm news

giu11

11/06/2024

Parere all’Autorità garante della concorrenza e del mercato in merito al procedimento avviato nei confronti di Vueling Airlines S.A. in materia di pratiche commerciali scorrette PS/12650

Ai sensi dell'art. 27 comma 6 del Codice del Consumo, l'Agcm ha richiesto un parere all'Agcom in merito allo svolgimento di pratica commerciale scorretta posta in essere mediante l' uso di internet dalla

giu11

11/06/2024

Parere sullo schema di Regolamento per le infrastrutture digitali e per i servizi cloud per la pubblica amministrazione

Il Garante Privacy ha, ai sensi degli artt. 36, par. 4, e 58, par. 3, lett. b), del Regolamento, espresso parere favorevole sullo schema di Regolamento per le infrastrutture digitali e per i servizi

giu11

11/06/2024

La McDonald's perde il marchio dell'Unione europea Big Mac per i prodotti a base di pollame

Con la Sentenza del Tribunale nella causa T-58/23 | Supermac’s / EUIPO - McDonald’s International Property (BIG MAC) e'stato dichiarato che, per alcuni prodotti e servizi,

Lawyer News

giu11

11/06/2024

Fallimento della supersocietà di fatto: quali sono i presupposti?

È necessario accertare l’esistenza dell’ente

giu11

11/06/2024

Rapina impropria: si consuma con la sottrazione del bene

Per il perfezionamento del reato non è

giu11

11/06/2024

Lavoro e privacy: il dipendente ha diritto di accedere ai propri dati

Condannata una banca per non avere reso