Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 giugno 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

giu30

30/06/2026

Intelligenza Artificiale 2026:Rapporto sull'Intelligenza Artificiale 2026: le principali trasformazioni tecnologiche, economiche e giuridiche legate allo sviluppo dei modelli di IA e il ruolo di AGCOM nel nuovo ecosistema digitale europeo

Pubblicato il Rapporto sull’Intelligenza Artificiale dell’Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, che offre una ricostruzione organica delle principali trasformazioni tecnologiche,

giu12

12/06/2026

The European Data Protection Board welcomes comments on the Template for personal data breach notification.

The template is subject to a public consultation, providing stakeholders with the opportunity to share their comments and feedback on the content of the template. Following the public consultation,

giu12

12/06/2026

Search engine delisting: When to act and what to do

Search engine providers play a crucial role in how personal data is disseminated online. Under the GDPR, individuals have the “right to be forgotten”—meaning they can request

News Giuridiche

giu30

30/06/2026

Terrazza a livello a cui si accede dall’appartamento: si presume comune se funge da copertura

L’assegnazione in proprietà o in uso esclusivo

giu30

30/06/2026

Il Massimario AGCM e AGCOM: maggio-giugno 2026

<p>Il Massimario del mese di maggio-giugno

giu30

30/06/2026

L'avvocato non è mai in pausa: il richiamo disciplinare che non si può ignorare

Dal richiamo verbale definitivo al principio