Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 june 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

News archive

 

Firm news

apr21

21/04/2026

Trasporti aerei – Regolamento (CE) n. 261/2004 – Articolo 8, paragrafo 1 – Rimborso del prezzo di un biglietto in caso di cancellazione del volo

la Corte di Giustizia dell' UE, con sentenza del 16 gennaio 2026 (Quarta Sezione), nella causa C-45/24, avente ad oggetto la domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale proposta alla Corte, ai sensi

apr21

21/04/2026

Diritto ad accesso proprie email dopo fine rapporto lavoro Sanzione di 50mila euro ad una compagnia assicurativa

lL Garante per la protezione dei dati personali ha affermato che il lavoratore può accedere ai messaggi del proprio account email aziendale e ai documenti presenti nel pc dopo la fine del rapporto

apr21

21/04/2026

Il Garante privacy sanziona Poste Italiane e Postepay per oltre 12,5 milioni di euro

Il Garante privacy ha comunicato in data 20 aprile 2026 di aver irrogato una sanzione di 6.624.000 euro a Poste Italiane S.p.A. e una di 5.877.000 euro a Postepay S.p.A., per aver trattato

Lawyer News

apr21

21/04/2026

Condominio: le aree destinate a parcheggio sono parti comuni salvo titolo contrario

In base all'art. 18 della legge ''ponte''

apr21

21/04/2026

XXV emendamento USA: cos'è, come funziona e perché è al centro del dibattito politico

Il XXV emendamento della Costituzione degli

apr21

21/04/2026

Mediazione CAM: cresce del 39% il valore delle controversie

Secondo le rilevazioni statistiche della