Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 june 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

News archive

 

Firm news

gen23

23/01/2026

Approvazione delle condizioni economiche di offerta di un nuovo profilo di velocità e di nuove durate IRU per il servizio “BTS attiva” fornito nelle aree di cui al piano “Italia a 1 Giga” dal beneficiario di aiuti di Stato Open Fiber

Con la delibera n. 319/25/CONS si approvano, ai sensi delle delibere n. 406/21/CONS e n. 420/22/CONS e sulla base dei criteri di equità e ragionevolezza, nel rispetto di quanto indicato nei Bandi

gen9

09/01/2026

Tariffe minime di consegna di libri

La Sentenza della Corte di Giustizia dell' UE, nella causa C-366/24 | Amazon EU, riconosce che  l’imposizione, con una misura nazionale, di tariffe minime per la consegna a domicilio

gen9

09/01/2026

In caso di utilizzo di una telecamera indossabile (bodycam) durante il controllo dei biglietti, alcune informazioni devono essere fornite immediatamente al passeggero interessato

La Sentenza della Corte di Giustizia dell' UE, nella causa C-422/24 | Storstockholms Lokaltrafik, affronta il caso di una azienda di trasporto pubblico di Stoccolma (Svezia) che  fornisce ai

Lawyer News

gen23

23/01/2026

Per i figli mantenimento commisurato alle risorse familiari e al tenore di vita precedente

<p>Il <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10SE0003094010"

gen23

23/01/2026

Il riciclaggio è configurabile anche se il bene è stato acquisito con un negozio lecito

Il disvalore si colloca sul piano dell'impiego