Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 june 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

News archive

 

Firm news

feb2

02/02/2026

Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy (application no. 40607/19 and 34583/20)

In the  Judgment of 8 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights, in the case law related to the application of Art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

feb2

02/02/2026

CASE OF FERRIERI AND BONASSISA v. ITALY (Applications nos. 40607/19 and 34583/20) sent. del 8.1.2026

Nel procedimento in epigrafe, viene chiarito che l'ordinamento italiano  che consente 'accesso ai dati bancari disposto nell'ambito di verifiche fiscali non è compatibile con l'articolo

feb2

02/02/2026

Natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy

La Corte di Cassazione (Sezione 1|Civile|Sentenza|17 gennaio 2026| n. 984) e' tornata a ribadire la natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy. Si

Lawyer News

feb3

03/02/2026

Sanatoria sismica tra procedure, lesività dell’atto e rischio penale

La linea tracciata dal TAR Campania: in