Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

30 giugno 2020

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and gas services, consisting both in the billing of various cost items and cancellation penalties not payable by users, and the omission of relevant and transparent information about the nature of these charges.

In particular, in the event of a contractual withdrawal, Enegan charged the users with charges by way of recovery of the activation costs which represented, conversely, penalties for leaving the contract, which the Company only reversed on bills following repeated customer complaints.

The company also proceeded to bill users with further charges that were determined incorrectly (administrative charges), or not provided for in the contracts signed (equalising charges), or in contrast with the regulations in force (postal charges).

In other cases, Enegan unilaterally changed the economic terms and conditions of the contracts, without sending a prior notice, thus preventing its customers from withdrawal from the supply contract without charge, in case of non-acceptance of the economic changes.

The issuing of invoices inclusive of such incorrect charges generated a great number of complaints from users that Enegan considered to be well founded in most cases. In fact, in accepting the complaints, it acknowledged that the disputed charges were "not due" and caused by dysfunctions or anomalies in the billing system, up to proceed with the related reversal.

However, before the end of proceedings Enegan took important measures in favour of consumersaimed at changing its billing policy, in particular by eliminating the clauses which, in the event of users’s withdrawal, allowed the Company to bill additional charges (penalties) or revoke any discounts and benefits granted to the customer during the contractual phase.

In consideration of the seriousness of the conduct, the Authority imposed a fine of 2,875,000 euros on Enegan.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

apr16

16/04/2024

Codice delle Comunicazioni elettroniche

Pubblicato il DECRETO LEGISLATIVO 24 marzo 2024, n. 48 , recante le Disposizioni correttive al decreto legislativo 8 novembre 2021, n. 207, di attuazione della direttiva (UE) 2018/1972 del

apr5

05/04/2024

Diritto d'Autore:La normativa italiana che esclude dalla gestione dei diritti d’autore le società indipendenti stabilite in un altro Stato membro è incompatibile con il diritto dell’Unione

Con la sentenza del 21 marzo 2024, la Corte di Giustizia dell'UE, nella causa C-10/22 | LEA ha stabilito che la normativa italiana che esclude dalla gestione dei diritti d’autore le societa` indipendenti

apr5

05/04/2024

Tutela dei consumatori: Agcm sanziona per i oltre 4 milioni Verisure

Per l'Agcm, la società ha promosso in maniera ingannevole il sistema di allarme Verisure, ha ostacolato il recesso dal contratto e ha attivato automaticamente il servizio durante il periodo di

News Giuridiche

apr18

18/04/2024

Sosta vietata in ZTL: tra presunzione di colpevolezza e diligenza

Una volta provata dall'autorità amministrativa

apr18

18/04/2024

Avvocati e modelli negoziali di digital twin

L’International Bar Association mette in

apr18

18/04/2024

Processo penale, le S.U. intervengono su 2 questioni in materia cautelare

L'imputato può presentare materiale sopravvenuto