Riconoscimenti

Anno 2019

Media Law International

 

Anno 2018

MEDIA LAW INTERNATIONAL

Anno 2018

Leading Lawyer Telecoms & Media - Who’sWhoLegal

 

Anno 2017

Global Law Experts

 

Anno 2017

Top Legal Guida" per "Autorità Indipendenti

 

Anno 2017 

L'Avv. Fabrizio Cugia di Sant'Orsola, avvocato dell'anno in Tmt – Technology

 

Top Legal 500

Within TMT, Cugia Cuomo & Associati is a third tier firm

 

Anno 2016

Corporate INTL 2016

Lo Studio Cugia Cuomo & Associati is Communications Law Firm of the Year in Italy.

 

Top Legal Industry Awards 2016

Cugia Cuomo & Associati is Law Firm of the Year 2016 in TMT - Technology.

 

Media Law International 2016

Cugia Cuomo & Associati is ranked in tier 3. 

 

Anno 2014

 Legal 500

Within TMT, Cugia Cuomo & Associati is a third tier firm

 

Media Law International 2014

Cugia Cuomo & Associati is ranked in tier 4.

 

Top Legal Awards

Nella rosa dei finalisti per il settore IP/TMT.

 

Anno 2013

Cugia Cuomo & Associati ranks in II and III tier on Top Legal

Cugia Cuomo & Associati is in the 2013 rankings of Italian leading legal magazine Top Legal in “Telecommunications“, “TMT: competition & litigation” and “TMT: regulatory and commercial”.

 

Anno 2011

Corporate INTL 2013

Cugia Cuomo & Associati is the Italian Telecoms Law Firm of the Year 2011 according to Corporate International Magazine.

News dello studio

lug6

06/07/2020

PMI Digital Transformation: requisiti soggettivi per l’accesso ai fondi

E’ stato registrato dalla Corte dei Conti ed è in corso di pubblicazione nella Gazzetta Ufficiale il decreto attuativo del Ministero dello Sviluppo economico che favorisce la trasformazione

giu30

30/06/2020

White Paper on Artificial Intelligence

On June 29, 2020, EDPS issued its Opinion on the EuropeanCommission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust. The aim

giu30

30/06/2020

Antitrust:ICA: penalty of 2,875,000 euros to Enegan for billing electricity and gas charges not due by users

The Authority has concluded the proceedings filed against Enegan, by ascertaining the adoption by the abovementioned company of an incorrect practice in the context of the supply of electric power and