The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

mag12

12/05/2026

Approvazione delle condizioni tecnico economiche del servizio “Open Stream FWA 5G” per il completamento della copertura nelle c.d. aree bianche (Listino "C&D”) da parte di Open Fiber S.p.A. beneficiario di aiuto di Stato

Con la delibera n. 96/26/CONS Agcom approva, ai sensi delle delibere n. 120/16/CONS e n. 171/25/CONS e sulla base dei criteri indicati negli Orientamenti della Commissione europea, nel rispetto di quanto

mag12

12/05/2026

Avvio del procedimento e della consultazione pubblica concernenti l’approvazione delle offerte di riferimento di TIM per gli anni 2025 e 2026 relative ai servizi di terminazione delle chiamate nella rete telefonica pubblica fissa

In applicazione della delibera n. 13/22/CONS di analisi dei mercati dei servizi d’interconnessione nella rete telefonica pubblica fissa, TIM ha pubblicato le offerte di riferimento relative ai

mag12

12/05/2026

Concorsi pubblici ed intelligenza artificiale

(T.A.R. Lazio Roma, Sez. III bis, 02/02/2026, n. 1895CONCORSI A PUBBLICI IMPIEGHI › Bando del concorso, requisiti, ammissione ed esclusioneParti: P.C. c. Ministero dell'Istruzione e