The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

set25

25/09/2026

Le novità per i soggetti NIS

Si e'tenuta il 18 settembre 2026, la riunione plenaria del Tavolo di attuazione della NIS dell’Agenzia per la cybersicurezza nazionale, con le Autorità di settore e i rappresentanti

set25

25/09/2026

EDPB fa luce sull'anonimizzazione e sullo scraping web per l'IA generativa e adotta la versione finale delle linee guida sulla blockchain

EDPB ha adottato orientamenti sull'anonimizzazione e orientamenti sul web scraping nel contesto dell'IA generativa. Inoltre, il Consiglio ha adottato la versione finale delle sue linee

set25

25/09/2026

EDPB armonizza la metodologia di calcolo delle ammende e adotta le linee guida finali DSA-GDPR

EDPB ha adottato la versione definitiva dei suoi orientamenti sull'interazione tra la legge sui servizi digitali e il regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati. Gli orientamenti sostengono

News Giuridiche

set25

25/09/2026

Concorso di magistratura, arrivano i test psicoattitudinali: la delibera del CSM

I requisiti che il candidato magistrato

set25

25/09/2026

USA, salute mentale degli avvocati: professione ''dannosa'' per 4 su 10

Uno studio condotto su oltre 37.000 legali