The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

ott27

27/10/2025

Reato di Diffamazione a mezzo piattaforma social

Molti non si rendono conto che il “web” non e’ un modo a sé stante e parallelo a quello reale, e le piattaforme social non sono una piazza dove “vomitare” commenti

ott27

27/10/2025

Finanziamenti al comparto manufatturiero ed al settore digitale e delle telecomunicazioni

  Con il decreto ministeriale 4 settembre 2025 sono state rese disponibili risorse pari a 731 milioni di euro, di cui: 530 milioni di euro per il sostegno delle iniziative

ott27

27/10/2025

Autoproduzione di energia da fonti rinnovabili nelle PMI. Proroga termine presentazione domande

Proroga del termine finale per la presentazione delle domande di agevolazione di cui all’articolo 3, comma 1, del decreto direttoriale 30 giugno 2025, alle ore 12.00 del giorno 10 novembre 2025. Decreto (pdf) Comunicato

News Giuridiche

nov4

04/11/2025

Due giudici federali USA ammettono errori in sentenze dovuti all’uso di AI

La vicenda accende il dibattito su adozione

nov4

04/11/2025

Giustizia riparativa: firmati i protocolli con gli enti territoriali

Il Ministero della Giustizia ha sottoscritto

nov4

04/11/2025

Residenza fiscale degli artisti, e non, tra ''vecchie'' e ''nuove'' regole

La riforma del 2023, i chiarimenti di prassi