The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

lug13

13/07/2026

Google Android: the Court of Justice upholds Google’s fine of around €4.1 billion

Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU in Case C-738/22 P | Google and Alphabet v Commission The appeal brought by Google and its parent company Alphabet against the judgment of the General Court

lug13

13/07/2026

Judgment of the General Court in Joined Cases T-1079/23, T-1080/23 | Apple v Commission and T-214/24 Apple and Apple Distribution International v Commission

Digital services: the General Court of the EU dismisses Apple’s actions regarding its designation as a gatekeeper in relation to the App Store and iOS The General Court also rules that

lug13

13/07/2026

Opinion of the Advocate General in Cases C-535/25 | Amazon Italia Logistica, C-536/25 | Amazon Italia Services and C-537/25 | Amazon Italia Transport

According to Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona of the Court of Justice of the European Union, companies in the Amazon group provide postal services in Italy Consequently, the requirement

News Giuridiche

lug14

14/07/2026

Summer Shop: libri, ebook, riviste e corsi e-learning con sconti fino al 50%

L'estate è il momento perfetto per investire

lug14

14/07/2026

La salute mentale dedotta dai dati della didattica online

Dal dato comportamentale al dato sulla

lug14

14/07/2026

Autovelox, il Decreto atteso da 32 anni: cosa cambia per multe e ricorsi

Per i verbali futuri le contestazioni saranno