The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

gen9

09/01/2026

Tariffe minime di consegna di libri

La Sentenza della Corte di Giustizia dell' UE, nella causa C-366/24 | Amazon EU, riconosce che  l’imposizione, con una misura nazionale, di tariffe minime per la consegna a domicilio

gen9

09/01/2026

In caso di utilizzo di una telecamera indossabile (bodycam) durante il controllo dei biglietti, alcune informazioni devono essere fornite immediatamente al passeggero interessato

La Sentenza della Corte di Giustizia dell' UE, nella causa C-422/24 | Storstockholms Lokaltrafik, affronta il caso di una azienda di trasporto pubblico di Stoccolma (Svezia) che  fornisce

gen9

09/01/2026

Recommendations 2/2025 on the legal basis for requiring the creation of user accounts on e-commerce websites.

The European Data Protection Board welcomes comments on the Recommendations 2/2025 on the legal basis for requiring the creation of user accounts on e-commerce websites.Such comments should be

News Giuridiche

gen15

15/01/2026

Risarcimento danni sinistri e responsabilità medica: aggiornati gli importi

Aggiornati gli importi dei risarcimenti

gen15

15/01/2026

La controversia del font Calibri: un'analisi etica e giuridica

La polemica woke e la stagnazione, responsabilità

gen15

15/01/2026

Facebook: non è diffamazione dire “fai pace con il cervello”

<p>La pubblicazione di un post su