The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

ott15

15/10/2025

Parere all’Autorità garante della concorrenza e del mercato in merito allo schema di provvedimento relativo all’operazione di concentrazione C12726 – Poste Italiane / Telecom Italia

La delibera esprime parere adesivo, per i profili di competenza dell’Autorità, alle conclusioni dell’AGCM, riportate nello schema di provvedimento relativo al procedimento in

ott15

15/10/2025

Approvazione delle condizioni economiche dei nuovi servizi Internet of Things forniti nelle c.d. aree bianche (Listino "C&D") e dei servizi Wavelength forniti nelle c.d. aree grigie (Listino "Italia a 1 Giga") da Open Fiber S.p.A. beneficiario di aiuti di

Con la delibera n. 222/25/CONS, l' Agcom ha approvato, ai sensi delle delibere n. 120/16/CONS, n. 406/21/CONS, n. 420/22/CONS e n. 171/25/CONS e sulla base dei criteri di equità e ragionevolezza,

ott15

15/10/2025

Private videos - The Italian Data Protection Authority warns CamHub: no to the disclosure of images stolen from italians' homes

The collection and subsequent disclosure of videos unlawfully obtained from cameras located in private places in Italy is an infringement of European and national privacy regulations. The Italian

News Giuridiche