The Court of Justice of the EU, for the first time, the EU regulation enshrining ‘internet neutrality’

15 settembre 2020

Accordign to the Court ( C-807/18 and C-39/19),  the conclusion of agreements, by which given customers subscribe to a package combining a ‘zero tariff’ and measures blocking or slowing down the traffic linked to the use of ‘non-zero tariff’ services and applications, is liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights, within the meaning of Article 3(2) of Regulation 2015/2120, on a significant part of the market.

Such packages are liable to increase the use of the favoured applications and services and, accordingly, to reduce the use of the other applications and services available, having regard to the measures by which the provider of the internet access services makes that use technically more difficult, if not impossible. Furthermore, the greater the number of customers concluding such agreements, the more likely it is that, given its scale, the cumulative effect of those agreements will result in a significant limitation of the exercise of end users’ rights, or even undermine the very essence of those rights.

The Court found that, in order to make a finding of incompatibility with that provision, no assessment of the effect of measures blocking or slowing down traffic on the exercise of end users’ rights is required. Article 3(3) does not lay down such a requirement in order to assess whether the general obligation of equal and non-discriminatory treatment of traffic in that provision has been complied with. In addition, the Court held that, where measures blocking or slowing down traffic are based not on objectively different technical quality of service requirements for specific categories of traffic, but on commercial considerations, those measures must in themselves be regarded as incompatible with Article 3(3).

Consequently, packages such as those the subject of review by the referring court are, generally, liable to infringe both paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 3 of Regulation 2015/2120, it being specified that the competent national authorities and courts may examine those packages at the outset in the light of Article 3(3).

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

nov11

11/11/2026

Linee Guida per l’adozione di IA nella Pubblica Amministrazione

In data 9 novembre 2026, l' Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale (Agid) ha adottato le Linee Guida per l’adozione di IA nella Pubblica Amministrazione. Le Linee Guida per l’adozione, lo sviluppo

nov10

10/11/2026

Intelligenza artificiale nella Pubblica Amministrazione

Con il provvedimento n. 760 del 7 ottobre 2026, il Garante Privacy ha espresso parere favorevole sullo schema di regolamento della Provincia autonoma di Trento che disciplina l’utilizzo dei sistemi

nov10

10/11/2026

La possibilità di sottrazione dei codici attraverso tecniche fraudolente (phishing, spoofing)rientra nel rischio d’impresa del prestatore di servizi di pagamento

  In tema di servizi di pagamento disciplinati dal d.lgs. 27 gennaio 2010, n. 11, la responsabilità dell’intermediario per operazioni compiute mediante strumenti elettronici non autorizzate

News Giuridiche

nov13

13/11/2026

Riforma professione di commercialista: ok definitivo alla legge-delega

<p>In G.U. la <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10LX0001015903SOMM"

nov13

13/11/2026

Violenza di genere: firmato il protocollo tra Ministero Giustizia e Conferenza Regioni

Il documento impegna la Conferenza a condividere