Italian Competition Authority: investigation initiated against Intesa Sanpaolo for an alleged unfair commercial practice

29 settembre 2022

The Authority is scrutinising how the banking group marketed its fixed-rate and floating-rate real estate mortgage loans: the bank allegedly failed to provide consumers with clear information on the duration of the interest-only period

The Italian Competition Authority has initiated investigation proceedings against Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. for allegedly adopting an unfair commercial practice that concerned the marketing of fixed-rate and floating-rate real estate mortgage loans for consumers.

According to the Authority, in the marketing phases of real estate loans, the banking group would not provide clear information on how to calculate the duration of the interest-only period, i.e. the time that elapses between the disbursement of the loan and the first instalment of the repayment plan, which can sometimes be a significant cost element.

In particular, it would appear that, without providing adequate information to the consumer in the various pre-contractual documents and the various preliminary phases, including advanced ones, leading up to the signing of the loan proposal, Intesa Sanpaolo makes use of a period of technical interest-only period, the duration of which is variable.

The credit institution does not seem to provide clear and adequate information on how to calculate the duration of this phase which, in essence, extends the loan repayment period and increases its cost.

Moreover, in the case of floating rates, the burden connected with the duration of the technical interest-only period also apparently adds to that of the applied rate, which would appear to be higher than the negotiated rate, with the bank allegedly failing to provide consumers with adequate information on its value in all the pre-contractual documentation, even when negotiations are at a very advanced stage.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

feb2

02/02/2026

Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy (application no. 40607/19 and 34583/20)

In the  Judgment of 8 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights, in the case law related to the application of Art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

feb2

02/02/2026

CASE OF FERRIERI AND BONASSISA v. ITALY (Applications nos. 40607/19 and 34583/20) sent. del 8.1.2026

Nel procedimento in epigrafe, viene chiarito che l'ordinamento italiano  che consente 'accesso ai dati bancari disposto nell'ambito di verifiche fiscali non è compatibile con l'articolo

feb2

02/02/2026

Natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy

La Corte di Cassazione (Sezione 1|Civile|Sentenza|17 gennaio 2026| n. 984) e' tornata a ribadire la natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy. Si

News Giuridiche

feb2

02/02/2026

Avvocati, fine del mandato: quali sono i documenti da consegnare?

Confronto tra doveri del lawyer (ABA, Formal

feb2

02/02/2026

Decreto legislativo n. 231/2001: c'è un'idea di riforma

Il Tavolo tecnico presso il Ministero della