DPIA Lists

01 ottobre 2018

On 26 September 2018, the European Data Protection Authorities, assembled in the European Data Protection Board, met for their third plenary session. During the plenary a wide range of topics were discussed. In particular, the EDPB reached an agreement on and adopted the 22 opinions establishing common criteria for Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) lists. These lists form an important tool for the consistent application of the GDPR across the EU. DPIA is a process to help identify and mitigate data protection risks that could affect the rights and freedoms of individuals. To help clarify the types of processing which could require a DPIA, the GDPR calls for the national supervisory authorities to create and publish lists of types of operations that are likely to result in a high risk. The Board received 22 national lists with an overall of 260 different types of processing. The EDPB Chair, Andrea Jelinek said: “It has been an enormous task for the members of the Board as well as the EDPB Secretariat to examine all of these lists and to establish common criteria on what triggers a DPIA and what not. It was an excellent opportunity for the EDPB to test the possibilities and challenges of consistency in practice. The GDPR does not require full harmonisation or an 'EU list', but does require more consistency, which we have achieved in these 22 opinions by agreeing on a common view.” The 22 opinions on the DPIA lists result from art 35.4 and art. 35.6 GDPR and are in line with earlier guidance established by the Article 29 Working Party.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

feb2

02/02/2026

Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy (application no. 40607/19 and 34583/20)

In the  Judgment of 8 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights, in the case law related to the application of Art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

feb2

02/02/2026

CASE OF FERRIERI AND BONASSISA v. ITALY (Applications nos. 40607/19 and 34583/20) sent. del 8.1.2026

Nel procedimento in epigrafe, viene chiarito che l'ordinamento italiano  che consente 'accesso ai dati bancari disposto nell'ambito di verifiche fiscali non è compatibile con l'articolo

feb2

02/02/2026

Natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy

La Corte di Cassazione (Sezione 1|Civile|Sentenza|17 gennaio 2026| n. 984) e' tornata a ribadire la natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy. Si

News Giuridiche

feb5

05/02/2026

Accountability e GenAI: dalla responsabilità giuridica alla governance algoritmica

Analisi dei diversi profili di differenziazione

feb5

05/02/2026

Contributi di Cassa Forense: niente rottamazione quinquies

L’ente previdenziale degli avvocati ricorda

feb5

05/02/2026

The Rainmaker e come si diventa avvocati oggi

La serie ispirata al romanzo di John Grishamn