Administrative fines imposed on a telephone service provider

17 ottobre 2019

 EDPB publised the the information related to the fines imposed   on a telephone service provider by the Hellenic DPA.

1) Imposition of a fine for breach of the principle of accuracy and data protection by design when keeping personal data of subscribers

The Hellenic DPA has received complaints from telephone subscribers of the Hellenic Telecommunications Organization (“OTE”) who, although registered in the OTE’s do-not-call register (according to Article 11 of Law 3471/2006), they received unsolicited calls from third companies for the promotion of products and services.

The investigation of the case showed that those subscribers had submitted a portability request for the transfer of their subscription to another provider. As a consequence, OTE deleted their entries from the do-not-call register. However, when those subscribers cancelled their portability request, there was no proper procedure to cancel their removal from the register. Subscribers were listed as registrants in the internal system of the provider’s customer service, but their telephone numbers were not included in the register sent by OTE to the advertisers, as the two systems, due to the error in their interconnection, did not have the same content. 

The Authority found that this incident affected a large number of individual subscribers, as there was an infringement of Article 25 (data protection by design) and Article 5 (1) (c) (principle of accuracy) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). It therefore imposed an administrative fine of EUR 200.000 on the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 83 (2) of the Regulation.

 

(2) Imposition of a fine for failure to satisfy the right to object and the principle of data protection by design when keeping personal data of subscribers

 

The Hellenic DPA has received complaints from the recipients of advertising messages from OTE concerning their lack of ability to unsubscribe from the list of recipients of advertising messages. In the course of the examination of the complaints it emerged that from 2013 onwards, due to a technical error, the removal from the lists of recipients of advertising messages did not operate for those recipients who used the “unsubscribe” link. OTE did not have the appropriate organisational measure, i.e. a defined procedure by which it could detect that the data subject’s right to object could not be satisfied. 

Subsequently, OTE removed around 8.000 persons from the addressees of the messages, who had unsuccessfully attempted to withdraw from 2013 onwards. The Authority has found an infringement of the right to object to the processing for direct marketing purposes (Article 21 (3) of the GDPR) as well as Article 25 (data protection by design) of the GDPR and imposed an administrative fine of EUR 200.000 on the basis of the criteria of Article 83 (2) of the Regulation.

 

Decision 34/2019 is available in Greek on www.dpa.gr  Decisions”

Communications Department

For further information, please contact the Greek SA directly: contact@dpa.gr

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

giu30

30/06/2026

Intelligenza Artificiale 2026:Rapporto sull'Intelligenza Artificiale 2026: le principali trasformazioni tecnologiche, economiche e giuridiche legate allo sviluppo dei modelli di IA e il ruolo di AGCOM nel nuovo ecosistema digitale europeo

Pubblicato il Rapporto sull’Intelligenza Artificiale dell’Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, che offre una ricostruzione organica delle principali trasformazioni tecnologiche,

giu12

12/06/2026

The European Data Protection Board welcomes comments on the Template for personal data breach notification.

The template is subject to a public consultation, providing stakeholders with the opportunity to share their comments and feedback on the content of the template. Following the public consultation,

giu12

12/06/2026

Search engine delisting: When to act and what to do

Search engine providers play a crucial role in how personal data is disseminated online. Under the GDPR, individuals have the “right to be forgotten”—meaning they can request

News Giuridiche

giu30

30/06/2026

Terrazza a livello a cui si accede dall’appartamento: si presume comune se funge da copertura

L’assegnazione in proprietà o in uso esclusivo

giu30

30/06/2026

Il Massimario AGCM e AGCOM: maggio-giugno 2026

<p>Il Massimario del mese di maggio-giugno

giu30

30/06/2026

L'avvocato non è mai in pausa: il richiamo disciplinare che non si può ignorare

Dal richiamo verbale definitivo al principio