1.2 billion euro fine for Facebook as a result of EDPB binding decision

24 maggio 2023

Following the EDPB’s binding dispute resolution decision of 13 April 2023, Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (Meta IE) was issued a 1.2 billion euro fine following an inquiry into its Facebook service, by the Irish Data Protection Authority (IE DPA). This fine, which is the largest GDPR fine ever, was imposed for Meta’s transfers of personal data to the U.S. on the basis of standard contractual clauses (SCCs) since 16 July 2020. Furthermore, Meta has been ordered to bring its data transfers into compliance with the GDPR.

In its binding decision of 13 April 2023, the EDPB instructed the IE DPA to amend its draft decision and to impose a fine on Meta IE. Given the seriousness of the infringement, the EDPB found that the starting point for calculation of the fine should be between 20% and 100% of the applicable legal maximum. The EDPB also instructed the IE DPA to order Meta IE to bring processing operations into compliance with Chapter V GDPR, by ceasing the unlawful processing, including storage, in the U.S. of personal data of European users transferred in violation of the GDPR, within 6 months after notification of the IE SA’s final decision.

The IE DPA's final decision incorporates the legal assessment expressed by the EDPB in its binding decision, adopted on the basis of Art. 65(1)(a) GDPR after the IE DPA, as lead supervisory authority (LSA), had triggered a dispute resolution procedure concerning the objections raised by several concerned supervisory authorities (CSAs). Among others, CSAs issued objections aiming to include an administrative fine and/or an additional order to bring processing into compliance*.

The final decision taken by the IE DPA is available in the Register for Decisions taken by supervisory authorities and courts on issues handled in the consistency mechanism.

Archivio news

 

News dello studio

giu12

12/06/2026

The European Data Protection Board welcomes comments on the Template for personal data breach notification.

The template is subject to a public consultation, providing stakeholders with the opportunity to share their comments and feedback on the content of the template. Following the public consultation,

giu12

12/06/2026

Search engine delisting: When to act and what to do

Search engine providers play a crucial role in how personal data is disseminated online. Under the GDPR, individuals have the “right to be forgotten”—meaning they can request

giu12

12/06/2026

ISTITUZIONE DI UN TAVOLO TECNICO PER LA GARANZIA DEL PLURALISMO E LA TUTELA DEL DIRITTO D’AUTORE SULLE PIATTAFORME DIGITALI CHE UTILIZZANO SISTEMI DI INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE

L'Agcom ha istituito con la delibera 127/26/cons il “Tavolo tecnico per la garanzia del pluralismo e la tutela del diritto d’autore sulle piattaforme digitali che utilizzano sistemi

News Giuridiche

giu12

12/06/2026

Ancora sul patto di famiglia: tre recenti interventi dell’A.E.

<p>Tre documenti di prassi pubblicati

giu12

12/06/2026

Il Gip non può sollevare conflitto negativo di competenza se adotta la misura cautelare

<p>La <a href="https://onelegale.wolterskluwer.it/document/10SE0003173192"

giu12

12/06/2026

Bancarotta fraudolenta documentale: l'amministratore di fatto è equiparato a quello di diritto

L’amministratore di fatto è gravato dell’intera