A person who publishes a number of sales advertisements on a website is not automatically a ‘trader’

12 october 2018

According to the Court of Justice of the European Union, judgemnt of 4 October 2018 , in case C-105/17 , a person who publishes a number of sales advertisements on a website is not automatically a ‘trader’ . That activity may be regarded as a ‘commercial practice’ if that person is acting for purposes relating to his or her trade, business, craft or profession

The Court clarified  that the meaning and scope of the concept of ‘trader’ must be determined in relation to the concept of ‘consumer’, which refers to any individual not engaged in commercial or trade activities. 

The Court found on this point, that it is for the national court to determine, in each case, on the basis of all the facts in its possession, whether a natural person was acting for purposes relating to his or her trade, business, craft or profession by verifying, in  particular, whether the sale was carried out in an organised manner, whether it was a regular occurrence or was for profit, whether the offer was concentrated on a small number of goods, and to consider the legal status and technical experience of the seller. 

Moreover, in order for the activity analyzed in the case to be regarded as a ‘commercial practice’, the national court must establish that that activity originates from a ‘trader’, and, secondly, that it constitutes an act, omission, course of conduct or commercial communication ‘directly connected with the promotion, sale or supply of a product to consumers’. 

In those circumstances, the Court concluded that a natural person who simultaneously publishes on a website a number of advertisements offering new and second-hand goods for sale must be classified as a ‘trader’, and such an activity can constitute a ‘commercial practice’, only if that person is acting for purposes relating to his or her trade, business, craft or profession. 

News archive

 

Firm news

feb2

02/02/2026

Ferrieri and Bonassisa v. Italy (application no. 40607/19 and 34583/20)

In the  Judgment of 8 January 2026, the European Court of Human Rights, in the case law related to the application of Art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

feb2

02/02/2026

CASE OF FERRIERI AND BONASSISA v. ITALY (Applications nos. 40607/19 and 34583/20) sent. del 8.1.2026

Nel procedimento in epigrafe, viene chiarito che l'ordinamento italiano  che consente 'accesso ai dati bancari disposto nell'ambito di verifiche fiscali non è compatibile con l'articolo

feb2

02/02/2026

Natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy

La Corte di Cassazione (Sezione 1|Civile|Sentenza|17 gennaio 2026| n. 984) e' tornata a ribadire la natura perentoria dei termini per l'esercizione dei poteri sanzionatori del Garante Privacy. Si

Lawyer News

feb4

04/02/2026

La definizione di controllo nelle operazioni di venture capital

Definizioni e profili di rischio regolamentare

feb4

04/02/2026

Inaugurazione anno giudiziario 2026: i risultati del lavoro della Cassazione

Le performance in termini di efficienza

feb4

04/02/2026

AI Act, sì alla semplificazione ma tutelando i diritti fondamentali

Il Comitato Europeo per la Protezione dei